Breaking the political system

by | Jan 17, 2017 | Editor's Blog, Politics | 4 comments

With Republicans now trying to undo Obama’s legacy, we should also remember THEIR legacy from the Obama years. In an effort to make Obama a failed president, they broke our political system. Mitch McConnell played a long game that finally gave Republicans both Houses of Congress and the White House. He also gave the country Donald Trump.

Republicans like to blame Obama for the partisanship that’s ripped the country apart, but they own much of the blame. This week, former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor wrote a piece on Obama’s legacy saying, “President Obama started with an outstretched hand, but pulled it back with a policy lurch leftward to a place we could not go.” Cantor says that Obama refused to compromise on the stimulus and on health care, but a look at what Republicans were saying at the time is more revealing.

Just ten days after Barack Obama’s inauguration, House Republicans proudly voted unanimously against the stimulus package. A Heritage Foundation analyst said, “We’ll look back to that vote as one of the most significant votes Republicans cast. It gave them a very coherent voice.” In the Senate, a group of Republicans worked with Democrats to reduce the size of the stimulus and to add more tax cuts, but the final bill only got three Republican votes.

Even more telling is the story of the Obamacare fight. Unlike the narrative pushed by Republicans that it was a rushed bill, the Affordable Care Act was a long debated bill that drug out for almost a year. In his re-telling of it, Cantor claims Democrats refused to adopt Republican plans. More believable is the article Republican columnist and former George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum wrote at the time the Affordable Care Act finally passed in March, 2010. Frum said of the GOP:

“At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994.”

The goal was to make Obama fail, not make government work. Six months later, McConnell defined Republican priorities by saying, “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Frum’s article also explains why Republicans will have such a difficult with repealing the ACA.

“…[T]he gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.

“Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise – without weighing so heavily on small business – without expanding Medicaid?”

Clearly, governing was secondary to scoring political points. The GOP refused to negotiate even when Obama took up their ideas. Today, the GOP believes their own rhetoric and have left themselves with few options to address health care.

Republican intransigence increased when the Tea Party became a major factor in Republican politics. They shut down the government over raising the debt limit and eventually brought down their own House Speaker. While they were unable to stop Obama’s second term, they made Congress increasingly dysfunctional. The House voted more than 50 times to repeal Obamacare but never offered any help in making it work.

In the Senate, Mitch McConnell abused the filibuster to the point that Democrats eliminated it for most confirmation hearings. Republicans were right when they said Democrats would one day regret the decision, but they were wrong to say that they weren’t doing anything the Democrats hadn’t done. By the time, Democratic Leader Harry Reid pulled the so-called “nuclear option,” Republicans were blocking 17 court nominees and 59 administration nominees. To put that in perspective, when Republicans controlled the Senate in 2005, then-GOP Majority Leader Bill Frist threatened to use the nuclear option when Democrats held up seven judicial appointments with filibusters.

McConnell’s final and most outrageous act was denying Obama an appointment to the Supreme Court. In disregard for all Senate norms, he refused to hold hearings to replace Antonin Scalia even when Obama nominated a man praised by Democrats and Republicans alike. The goal, again, wasn’t to make government work but to fire up his conservative base and prevent Obama from governing.

As Norm Ornstein, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, wrote:

“The Republican Party has become an insurgent outlier in American politics — ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.”

Mitch McConnell and the Republicans broke our political system. McConnell played a long game. He understood that the party in the White House would get the blame for government dysfunction and failure. He made Washington as dysfunctional as possible, even while people were struggling to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression. He inflamed the passions of an angry electorate and got Trump as a nominee. In essence, he put partisanship and party politics before the good of the country. Now, we have to live with the mess he made.

4 Comments

  1. Rick gunter

    I still believe McConnell and the GOP will reap the whirlwind for their obstruction. The whirlwind is Donald Trump.

    Also, the Republicans met the day of the first Obama inauguration to conspire to make the new president a failure and a one-termer. They at least failed on that count. They are due a measure of payback.

  2. Stephen Lewis, Sr.

    Ty

    Harry Reid did some good things as Senate leader and did some not so good things. I think all in all he was a good leader but it was time for a change and I think Sen Schumer will be a good leader. I also think it is past time for Nancy Pelosi to step down but she does not want to go, until she does there is gong to be issues with the Democrats in the house. I think on day in the not too distant future the party may be forced to overthrow her and its not something I look forward to.

    As for the GOP they are like the dog chasing the car they just caught it and I am not sure they were prepared for that and thing are about to get real dysfunctional. Now the Democrats should act like adults for the next little bit I hope they know how to.

  3. TY Thompson

    One could argue that all that dysfunction is going to end because Harry Reid was playing the short game. Not detecting a lot of happiness about that, though. Yes, Frist blustered and threatened with the nuclear option but I doubt he’d have actually eliminated it. Reid obviously thought his party would hold the Senate forever.

  4. Arthur Dent

    This dysfunctionality in governing is reflected in the continued negative trend for approval/disapproval of Congress (01/13/2017 Gallup: Approve 19%/Disapprove/76%). I like to believe, although I am not a politician and try to steer clear of them, that what Americans want is government that solves our problems, then moves on to the inevitable next set of problems – sort of taking a Pareto approach (the most emergent 20% of the problems helps the remaining 80% of problems, but reveals a new top 20% to be solved) to the ever-increasing bundle of issues we have before us.

    We did not need eight years of our elected officials, whatever party they nominally represent, posing in outrage and pretending there was no common ground to be found. The Affordable Care Act and stimulus are just a couple of instances where the posing has made the truth of the matter obscure to the general population. If the ACA has a single major problem, it is that it was not implemented as intended, with North Carolina among the host of hold-outs on ostensibly ideological grounds.

    With the obscurantists now in power for at least two years (and I have to say that there is no telling what Trump will do once he has power over them as his rhetoric has been all over the place), I have great concerns that this trend towards solutions for the American majority – the vast majority which does not vote and doesn’t know why they vote the way they do in any sort of disciplined way – will continue. It may be that the ideological right will win some victories, but if they do they will be in the interest of a minority of the population.

    We need help in a bad way – and the President-Elect does not look like the help we need.

Related Posts

GET UPDATES

Get the latest posts from PoliticsNC delivered right to your inbox!

You have Successfully Subscribed!