The best Democrat for 2016

by | Apr 8, 2015 | 2016 Elections, Features, NC Politics | 4 comments

Kay Hagan still has a future in Democratic politics. And we all think she has at least one more race left in her.

But that campaign is a rematch against Thom Tillis, not the ill-timed turnaround against Richard Burr promoted by reporters who’ve barely set foot in North Carolina outside an airport.

There is no modern precedent for a defeated senator to challenge the state’s other senator, and Kay Hagan is hardly the boat-rocker one could envision trying to make that history.

Kay Hagan ran a great campaign last year. She lost, mostly because of low turnout. But she still outperformed other Democratic incumbents. And in a presidential year, once voters get to know Thom Tillis, they’ll want her back.

But it’s too soon, and Richard Burr is the wrong opponent. That’s why Hagan needs to step away from the spotlight, reflect on her loss, and maybe serve in Hillary’s cabinet, while building a case for why voters should return her to elected office.

But it’s someone else’s turn against Burr. Janet Cowell would make a fine candidate. So would senate minority leader Dan Blue, or army veterans Cal Cunningham, Grier Martin and Jeff Jackson. Yes, that Jeff Jackson.

There is no figure in North Carolina politics more exciting than the 32-year-old state senator from Charlotte. Profiling Jackson last month, I found that he possessed the traits of a reformer, with the cunning it takes to win.

And Jackson will raise money out of state when people find out the guy who “Goes Off For 6 Minutes On All The Politicians Sitting Right In Front Of Him” is running for U.S. Senate.

The biggest knock is that he’s new to politics; equally an asset as much as it is a liability. And if 2016 is a foreign policy election, it’d help to have a veteran of the War in Afghanistan debating former lawnmower salesman Richard Burr.

But Jackson is also a brand new father, and North Carolina Democrats, used to seeing their rising stars lose and fadeout, need him in the North Carolina Senate.

Before running for statewide office or Congress, Cal Cunningham, Eric Mansfield, Hampton Dillinger, George Battle and Ken Lewis served a combined four years in elected office; and not a day since.

North Carolina Democrats can’t risk losing Jackson as a legislator and leader in Raleigh, even if he’s an attractive candidate against Burr. He might end up a governor or senator one day, even president, but he’s also our best shot for pushing redistricting reform through the General Assembly. And that’s more important right now.

And as the party rallies around a candidate in the coming months, it’s important to focus more on the message than the individual.

Next year’s senate race is poised to be the closest and most heavily contested in America, again. And we have the responsibility to set the tone for 2016 by learning the lesson of 2014; that Democrats can’t win without substance.

In the simplest of terms, liberals want change and conservatives don’t. And that makes Republicans better suited to win scorched earth elections, where the candidates appeal to anger rather than reason.

Beyond the inherent disadvantage of being the president’s party in a midterm, Democrats screwed up last year by running a negative campaign against the Koch Brothers, rather than offering the American people an agenda that will change their lives.

In a presidential year, with high turnout, Democrats have better odds of victory. But against the entrenched incumbent Burr, it will take an above average campaign to win. And that’s why we need an intellectual throw down, provoked by the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate.

If the Democrat runs against Art Pope, Charles Koch and Mitch McConnell, while echoing DSCC talking points and ducking the issues, they will lose.

If they make the race about real people instead of political process, and find a way to fill those people with hope, they will win. That’s what it all comes down to.

Nobody got excited about the candidates last year, in either party.

The answer isn’t to double down on silly politics, scripted debates and personal attacks. It’s to candidly and optimistically discuss the challenges North Carolinians face, and offer solutions that aren’t written by the interns.

So what matters less in terms of whether the candidate should be Blue, or Cowell, or Tom Ross, is their personal background and their fundraising connections. What matters more is their willingness and courage to run a real campaign. 

4 Comments

  1. Lonnie Baucom

    And the winner is: Cal Cunningham. He would be the reincarnated John Edwards (the good one). Democrats love him for that smile. He treats everyone like his best friend.His opponent, Elaine Marshall, even liked him. No malice in that senate primary. He would run a campaign on where are we going instead of where we’ve been. One can’t change the past, but you surely can change the future.

    Voters, in general, R or D, would like a positive candidate instead of a negative one.
    Would the opposition try to claim that he sold the Panama Canal? He has very little baggage to sift through.

  2. Morris

    First Hagan may have one more race in her, but it’s more likely to be the Cooper River Bridge Run than the US Senate. In 2020 she’ll be moving into her late 60’s. And while I agree Tillis probably won due to turnout, both he and Hagan were weak candidates. She was the incumbent, so was “guaranteed” the nomination. Tillis was the default player from a weak bench.
    Burr will be a tough one, tougher than he may look. While the 2016 race will bring the turnout, and the the love he receives from his own party is certainly lukewarm, he doesn’t generate the hate on the other side either. Burr hasn’t shown the proclivity to make stupid mistakes to date. Plus Obama seems more and more likely to have the drag on NC Dem candidates in 2016 that Bush had on Rep’s in 2008.

  3. TY Thompson

    “North Carolina Democrats can’t risk losing Jackson as a legislator and leader in Raleigh, even if he’s an attractive candidate against Burr. He might end up a governor or senator one day, even president, but he’s also our best shot for pushing redistricting reform through the General Assembly. And that’s more important right now. ”

    I can see why you’d make this argument but it reflects on your priorities…that in-state races matter more than the U.S. Senate race. I’m not going to totally disagree with this but not throwing your best candidate at Burr because of his or her perceived need elsewhere is a mistake in my opinion…in a year when the Dem’s best shot at retaking the US Senate is 2016 because Reps have to defend so many seats, and that possibility shrinks in probability after 2016. Burr has a lot of money and very little else in his favor (don’t forget that the GOP base loves this guy the way the Dem base loves Kay Hagan….which is to say, pretty luke-warm at best and rather hostile in some sectors of his Party)

  4. LHMack

    Kay Hagan ran a coward’s campaign. Let us hope stronger and braver people are around to run against Burr and Tillis.

Related Posts

GET UPDATES

Get the latest posts from PoliticsNC delivered right to your inbox!

You have Successfully Subscribed!