Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Flannery's avatar

I think the biggest take away is that one size doesn't fit all. They all won the race they were running with the issues that most affected their voters. It seems most of the so called experts want all the candidates to fit in the same box and that doesn't work in state wide or city elections.

US Blues's avatar

“Democrats and the interest groups that fund them need to resist the urge to believe that people voted for them. They voted against Republicans.”

I think that statement is a very broad overgeneralization and misses the point that both can be true. For example, Mamdani ran an affirmative campaign about issues that matter to voters. (I refuse to use the boring, overused “kitchen table” cliche.) Mamdani also ran against Cuomo who used to be a democrat but was endorsed by trusk, so there’s more to this than Mamdani won just because he ran as a Dem and not a republican. 90,000 Mamdani campaign volunteers and over a million voters say otherwise.

In terms of your “nobody expected” paragraph, where have you been? The only thing surprising about the terror dump is blasting on a daily basis across the nation and the world is the speed with which it is occurring. Those who voted for dump absolutely expected all that he’s done in the “nobody expected” paragraph. That’s why they voted for him. Cruelty and chaos is the point for them.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?