Kim, You’re right. The 5th sentence is the one I had in mind for comment. And your usage point(s) about my structure of sentence would better serve. Good eye. Although I chose not the comma route with my structure as like Gertrude Stein I’m a bit comma averse and more inclined to dashes. Still. Nothing thrills me as much as sentence structure talking points. The original writer’s attempt to create a cause and effect between a Bernie loss and the 3 SCOTUS picks struck me as worth a comment; a most unstable relationship poorly drawn. (My use of ; in previous sentence, more for effect as I realize the ; does not join 2 independent clauses. I took a liberty here).
Yes, I left commas out of the 5th sentence. Your comment, while correct, suggests to me that you are a bit anal. Do you disagree that Clinton, Wasserman Schultz, and the dem party undermined Sanders? If so, stick to punctuation criticisms, you appear qualified to do that. If you agree that this was done( Clinton cheating) how can you not agree that this resulted in Trump winning, allowing him to choose three Supreme Court judges. Does punctuation always count?
I have no idea what Kim is talking about. Both the second and third sentences in my comment are very short sentences. I kind of feel sorry for you both.
Kim, You’re right. The 5th sentence is the one I had in mind for comment. And your usage point(s) about my structure of sentence would better serve. Good eye. Although I chose not the comma route with my structure as like Gertrude Stein I’m a bit comma averse and more inclined to dashes. Still. Nothing thrills me as much as sentence structure talking points. The original writer’s attempt to create a cause and effect between a Bernie loss and the 3 SCOTUS picks struck me as worth a comment; a most unstable relationship poorly drawn. (My use of ; in previous sentence, more for effect as I realize the ; does not join 2 independent clauses. I took a liberty here).
Yes, I left commas out of the 5th sentence. Your comment, while correct, suggests to me that you are a bit anal. Do you disagree that Clinton, Wasserman Schultz, and the dem party undermined Sanders? If so, stick to punctuation criticisms, you appear qualified to do that. If you agree that this was done( Clinton cheating) how can you not agree that this resulted in Trump winning, allowing him to choose three Supreme Court judges. Does punctuation always count?
I have no idea what Kim is talking about. Both the second and third sentences in my comment are very short sentences. I kind of feel sorry for you both.