The path of progress

by | Apr 26, 2013 | Civil Rights, NC Politics, Voting Rights | 3 comments

In so many ways, the voter-suppression fight has brought out the best in the Democratic party. One of the less prominent emphases of the pro-voter case is also among the most noble. Opponents of the Voter Identification law have pointed out that it may leave persons who have undergone sex change operations unable to produce a valid ID. By pointing to a specific instance of discrimination, North Carolina progressives fired the opening shot in the battle to affirm the rights of transgendered citizens. It is a cause as profound as the obstacles trans people face.

Like African-Americans under segregation, trans people are routinely denied access to public accommodations. In most states, including our own, it is legal to dismiss trans-people from their jobs simply for their gender identities. Even on government documents, it isn’t unheard of for a trans person to be referred not as “he” or “she” but as “it.” Taken together with restrictions on their movement and subjection to violence, this dehumanizing language completes a portrait that bears a sickening resemblance to Jim Crow.

Just as Democrats electorally sacrificed the Deep South to end one regime of segregation, they should take every risk to dismantle this one. The party’s temporary marginalization in North Carolina may work to the advantage of the cause, as activists focus on controverting widespread hatred. In the meantime, liberals should remember this: The brutal path of progress shows that dignity matters most.



  1. Thomas A.

    Let us see if you can get this into your little bitty brains. If you have a state issued ID with a photo on it you can use it to vote. If you have had “the operation” then you will need a new driver’s license with a photo of the “new you” on it. So what you will need to do is go to the county board of elections and re-register to vote under the new name with the new ID. So what is the problem?

  2. Meg

    may leave persons who have undergone sex change operations unable to produce a valid ID?
    Really? How? I love the liberals and progressives use the “may” or “could” as proof of something.
    It’s similiar to their pro”choice” labels……who doesn’t love a choice?
    “May” or “could” is just another example of the semantics that they think will “convince” people that it is fact.
    It amazes me that some people actually fall for such semantics because they do not think rationally.
    Give me examples as proof not “coulds, maybes or mays” then I will listen to your argument. But until then, I am not buying…..

    • Fitzzz

      Never stopped Barney Frank

Related Posts


Get the latest posts from PoliticsNC delivered right to your inbox!

You have Successfully Subscribed!